top of page
EUROPE

Communities in Serbia

Social housing in Supportive Environment (SHSE)

GOOD PRACTICE TITLE: Social housing in Supportive Environment (SHSE)

KIND OF PRACTICE: Housing for socially vulnerable and homeless

DOCUMENT AUTHOR: Housing Center – Housing Development Center for Socially Vulnerable Groups, Belgrade, Serbia Branislava Zarkovic

PLACE: Total of 34 municipalities in Serbia, Sabac Municipality as good practice example

CONTEXT, FIELD OF INTERVENTION:

In Serbia, housing sector is not seen as a political objective. Serbia has neither a functional system of affordable and social housing nor an adequate housing policy in place. Almost 98% of the housing stock is in the private property. Law on Social Housing was adopted in 2009, but mechanisms for its implementation have not been established yet. The mechanism that would assist the vulnerable in solving their housing needs has not yet been in power. The absence of the functional housing policy and strategies at a national level resulted in all groups of residents, with no exception of the most vulnerable, being forced to find a solution for their housing situation under the market conditions. This is not feasible for a large number of them due to the following reasons:

  • The estimated 24.6 % of population lives in risk of poverty1. The poorest are the ones residing in rural areas, uneducated and unemployed persons, refugees and IDPs, the elderly and the disabled.

  • The unemployment rate in Serbia is 24.6 %, being the highest in comparison with the neighboring countries.

  • It is estimated that the present shortage of apartments is about 100.000, which additionally raises the apartment prices on the market.

Under these conditions, it is obvious that the necessity for the support in solving housing needs of the most vulnerable is indispensable and urgent. SHSE concept was designed as response to the pressing need to resolve the housing problems of vulnerable refugee and displaced populations who have been living in temporary collective centers or inadequate housing situations for many years. There is also a need to support the local communities in absorbing vulnerable displaced populations, as well as Roma in informal settlements and returnees, and facilitating their integration process, in accordance with the National Strategy for Resolving the Problems of Refugees and IDPs and Local Action Plans.

 

The main purpose of the SHSE project is the integration of the most vulnerable citizens – refugees, internally displaced (IDPs), Roma and returnees, accommodated in the collective centers or inadequate accommodations, as well as homeless local population, through the provision of adequate housing solution.

PERIOD:

2003 to present

POPULATION, PARTICIPANTS:

Serbia is the country with the highest number of displaced persons in Europe. In the aftermath of the war conflicts in former Yugoslavia, Serbia provided refuge to about 600,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia and 210,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) from Kosovo. Refugees arrived to Serbia driven away by war conflicts in Bosnia and Croatia in 1993-1995 while internally displaced persons arrived in 1999, after Kosovo crisis. Both groups are mainly Serbs, except for 40,000 Roma among the displaced populations. The number of refugees in Serbia has been reduced for about 90% in the period 1996 – 2014. This drop in the number of refugees was manly a result of their integration in Serbia. In 2016 the Europe migration crisis brought new 6.000 migrants from Syria and Middle East to Serbia.

 

The persons accommodated in collective centers are considered to be the most vulnerable. Everyone capable of leaving collective centers independently had already done so. For the most part, the persons who remained in the centers were elderly persons, single parents, persons with disabilities and the multiply vulnerable and poor. They are predominately unemployed and their chances of finding work are limited. They rely on social assistance programs and seasonal work. A considerable part of vulnerable displaced population resided in private accommodation in extremely poor living conditions (in unfinished and inadequate housing units lacking basic installations and insulation, illegally and under a constant threat of eviction). At the same time, for many extensively vulnerable individuals and/or families living in private accommodation, coping mechanisms are strained to the maximum since they have to allocate a large part of their limited income to pay rent. It was a challenge to develop an approach which simultaneously lessens their social dependency and provides the vulnerable with a feeling of social belonging.

 

People accommodated in collective centers are de facto homeless people – they live in inadequate and temporary accommodation, in structures not intended for housing.

COORDINATORS:

The SHSE project is a result of a true partnership and is developed in synergy of different stakeholders, from the central level to the local one. The project is created in cooperation with the municipalities and is in line with their adopted Action Plans for support to vulnerable populations. The main partners in the project are:

1. Commissariat for Refugees and Migrations of the Republic of Serbia - coordinates the closure process of the collective centers and is responsible institution for dealing with refugees, internally displaced and returnees.

2. Local communities – 43 local communities are the final beneficiaries of the program, they provided construction land equipped with infrastructure and secured financial resources to cover the needs of the project

3. Local Centers for Social Work – 43 centers for social works joined the project and are taking care of accommodated vulnerable individuals and families by providing them the tailored support services

4. Implementing NGOs – there are several NGOs that are implementing SHSE project in Serbia. Housing Center is one of them, and has a deep understanding of the refugee & IDPs situation in Serbia and sound experience in building construction, which implemented majority of projects so far.

Other project stakeholders are:

1. Ministry of Labor and Social Policy of the Republic of Serbia - responsible for creating conditions for the project development and for providing guidance for its implementation.

2. Donor organizations - many donor organizations took part in the project financing or co-financing. Swiss Development and Cooperation was the initiator and the first donor of the project; EU is the most important donor of the project today. 3. UNHCR – responsible for protection of refugees and displaced.

4. Project beneficiaries - the collective centers residents and other vulnerable citizens of Serbia actively participate in the identification of the appropriate housing solution. Intensive information campaigns, different volunteering activities and capacity building programs strengthen their capacities to own the selected housing solution.

METHODOLOGY (HOW THE PRACTICE WORKS):

The project has two main components:

1. The construction of social housing units It is a challenge to create a living space that would foster solidarity, communication and inclusion. The newly built municipally owned apartments are of different size. Special attention is given to common places - common living rooms, common laundries, terraces and outer space (gardens, patios, etc.). These are the central spots for social contact and communication among the inhabitants and within the neighborhood. Due attention is given to the needs of the people with disabilities.

The buildings are close to the traffic network and public transport. Special care is taken that:

a. Building standards correspond to the average housing quality in the country

b. The projects are developed within the framework of a city’s overall urban planning strategy. Buildings are integrated into the urban structure, placed among other residential buildings and have appropriate access to the transport network and public services.

c. Lifetime Building Standards securing the adaptability of the buildings to the needs of the aging population are respected and introduced into the building practice in Serbia.

2. The creation of “Supportive Environment” Creation of a socially “supportive environment” is a continuous process, composed of a set of services provided by the Host Family, Centre for Social Work and Local Community – three pillars of the project.

  • The Host Family is a socially vulnerable family but with the working capacity. The family lives together with other families in the building and, by sharing the everyday activities, provide them with daily assistance of a good neighbor. It facilitates the integration in the new social environment, the development of good- neighborly relationship among the tenants, positive atmosphere in the building and mutual respect between the tenants and the neighborhood. It is a catalyst of the social life in the buildings; it supports the tenants’ initiatives, mediates in conflicts, encourages dialogue and supports group activities of the tenants and the neighborhood. It assists the development of solidarity among the tenants and their self-reliance.

  • The Center for Social Work is the basic unit of the social protection system in Serbia and it exists in each municipality. The Center renders professional services in the field of social protection and manages the buildings for social housing in supportive environment. The Center monitors the work of the host family and is responsible for its training. The Center defines the tailored support to the needs of each tenant and stimulates the creation of the conditions for independent life in the community.

  • The Local Community is responsible for financing of the service and is the key guarantee for its long-term sustainability. From its own budget the local community provides the funds for different subventions, in accordance with its own capacities and concrete needs - the funds for human resources engaged in the provision of service, capacity building programs and subventions. It is responsible for the long-term maintenance of the buildings.

The roles and obligations of three project pillars are precisely defined in the Guide Book on SHSE, developed by the Ministry of Social Policy, in cooperation with the Housing Center.

PARTICIPATORY PROCESS:

In the course of the project development, the participation of project beneficiaries has been given increasingly more attention. The residents have been consulted in several phases during the project realization:

  • 1. Collective Center Closure Solution Identification Phase Interviews with beneficiaries on the type of the housing solution that would be desirable for them after they leave the collective center, taking into consideration the family vulnerability in its life planning.

  • 2. Architectural Design Development Phase Participatory meetings with the beneficiaries, on the topic of their perception of living in an apartment and what it entails, bearing in mind all project limitations.

  • 3. Supportive Environment Creation Phase Beneficiaries have been included in a series of capacity building workshops. Topics such as “what is a good host, how to help and encourage, how to solve conflicts in an amicable manner, how to establish dialogue” have been raised.

TIME TO BE SUCCESFUL (HOW MANY TIME THE PRACTICE TAKE TO ACHIEVE THEIR OBJECTIVES):

There is an estimate, based on the concrete experiences, that the period of one to three years is needed for full psychological “ownership” of housing solutions offered with SHSE. Over time, as beneficiaries are strengthening their capacities and gaining more independence, due to the support services applied, most families need support only occasionally. It is important that municipal authorities are acquainted with this dynamics in order to ensure full financial support for all initial costs.

VALIDITY (IF THE PARTICIPANTS THINK THAT THE PRACTICE RESOLVED THE PROBLEMATIC):

In 2009 Housing Center, together with the Ministry for Social Policy of the Republic of Serbia, initiated and conducted the comprehensive research on the impact of the SHSE project on the improvement of living conditions and social inclusion of its beneficiaries. The research3. was carried out in 21 municipalities and towns in Serbia in which the project was implemented by 2009. The research findings confirmed that the SHSE project has facilitated the integration and social inclusion of the most vulnerable residents of CCs:

  • 81% of accommodated refugees obtained the Serbian citizenship,

  • 46% of beneficiaries (those that were in need) have started receiving social relief,

  • 47% of beneficiaries were additionally subsidized by the municipalities in paying living costs

  • 32% beneficiaries with working capacity found employment after moving into the buildings, 50% of them with the support of the Centers for Social Work

  • 100% children aged 7-19 years accommodated in SHSE buildings are regularly attending primary or secondary school. This refers to the Roma children as well. 39 children of 169 children aged 19 - 25 years are university students.

  • 7.7% of the total number of beneficiaries were Roma and no problems caused by different ethnical origin of beneficiaries have been registered. (Number of Roma families increased by the time. In 2017, the percentage of Roma beneficiaries in municipalities were there were Roma among persons accommodated in collective centers Is now 19.3% which corresponds to the share of Roma in total population of internally displaced people in Serbia).

  • All the beneficiaries have been taken care of as the citizens of the Republic of Serbia and they have been provided with the guaranteed level of material security.

IMPACT:

1. Impact on the closure of the collective centers Despite the fact that SHSE programme is decentralized from the welfare policy aspect, it strongly contributes to the national strategic goal – closure of the collective centers for migrants. Thanks to this project many collective centers have been closed. At least 80 % of 2’643 persons living in SHSE projects today, i.e. 2.114 individuals or 811 families are ex-residents of the closed collective centers.

 

2. Impact on the Social Welfare Policy changes On December 01 2005, The Government of Serbia adopted the Social Protection Development Strategy in Serbia that systematically anticipates the development of different types of services which are within the jurisdiction of the local communities. By adopting this Strategy, the Government confirmed its resolution to complete the decentralization and deinstitutionalization processes in the field of social protection. The development of the SHSE project went in parallel to the Strategy elaboration, which was very useful for gathering practical experiences, and it was an opportunity to determine the concrete indicators of changes.

3. Impact on the Social Housing Policy changes “The experience of this project actualized the issue of social housing in Serbia for socially vulnerable groups, including the domicile population and it has certainly contributed to resolving some issues in the Law on Social Housing. Owing to these projects, local self-governments started recognizing more and more their role and responsibility in providing for socially vulnerable populations.” (Ljiljana Lučić, State Secretary, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy of the Republic of Serbia)

 

4. Impact on the architecture of social housing buildings The Project offered the new architectural language to the social housing architecture in Serbia. The SHSE buildings and their design were regularly displayed on the Saloon of architecture, traditional and respected yearly exhibition of Serbian architecture. In 2012, the Main Award of the 34th Saloon was given to one of SHSE buildings. In 2011 the thematic exposition within the Belgrade International Week of Architecture BINA 2011 was dedicated to the architecture of SHSE buildings.

INNOVATION:

The SHSE is an innovative and comprehensive approach to social housing and housing of most vulnerable, fulfilling a number of social objectives. Apart from helping the socially disadvantaged to meet their housing needs, SHSE contributes to the creation of an inclusive society, by creating an environment that assists specific target groups in improving their opportunities in life. Creation of socially supportive environment is a continuous process, composed of a set of activities and services provided by the Host Family and the Centre for Social Work. The key innovative feature of this project is the role of the Host Family. It can be said that the institution of a Host Family introduced through this project is an attempt at institutionalizing solidarity.

RESOURCES OR CONDITIONS NEEDED FOR THE PRACTICE:

For construction of housing units:

- Land with infrastructure

- Technical documentation with building permission

- Construction cost

- Approx. 15.000 Euro/housing unit

 

For support services:

- Center for Social Work professional resources

- Host Family resources

LIMITATIONS:

The SHSE model rests on the key role of the Centres for Social Work, institutions which are for years lacking adequate resources both human and financial. It will be overcome by involving civil society as the service providers

LEARNED LESSONS: :

Importance of integrated support: Providing only housing is not enough to facilitate the successful social inclusion of extremely vulnerable groups. By providing good quality housing combined with continual, long term and individually tailored support, SHSE model

 

Spatially and socially integrated housing: By constructing the buildings on high quality locations and including beneficiaries from social groups with different ethnic and cultural background, SHSE model helps combat spatial segregation and stimulates intercultural enables integrated and simultaneous impact on the causes of social exclusion at all levels, and by doing so it is achieving far more significant results. Through successful implementation of the SHSE over the years it became clear that integrated support is most needed and at the same time most effective model for persons and families who are in the situation of multiple vulnerability. 4 Ibid, p. 3.
integration.

 

Importance of learning through continual monitoring and evaluation: The research conducted in 2009 by HC and the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy yielded significant insights and guidelines for further development, which should be a continuous practice.

 

Intensifying investments at the beginning enables long term and sustainable results later: SHSE model has a specific dynamics in terms of the resources required. In the initial period the investments need to be most intensive since at the beginning almost all beneficiaries require support. At start there are also most extensive training of host family and professionals working on the support provision. In time, as beneficiaries are strengthening their capacities and gaining more independence, due to the services applied, most families need support only occasionally. It is important that municipal authorities are acquainted with this dynamics in order to ensure full financial support for all initial costs.

SUSTAINABILITY:

Social Housing in Supportive Environment is a living, dynamic service whose results depend in large part on the imagination and initiative of the Centers for Social Work managing this service and Host Families, as well as on the beneficiaries for whom this service is intended. The key feature of the project is continuous provision of different support measures to the beneficiaries by the local community, Center for Social Work and Host Family in order to activate their potentials and enable them to live independently and actively participate in the life of community. The SHSE is financed by the local Governments, which recognized SHSE potential and are willing to extend the capacities.

REPLICABILITY:

The SHSE project is replicable/transferable locally/nationally and internationally:

  • Locally/nationally: SHSE has been successfully implemented in 43 municipalities in Serbia with different demographic, geographic and economic conditions.

  • Internationally: SHSE model has been transferred to Armenia 2005, and to Georgia 2007, two countries with similar experience in sheltering high number of vulnerable, and successfully implemented there.

CONCLUSION:

Several researches and evaluations of the programme confirmed the project qualities and its strong influence on beneficiaries’ social inclusion. “The majority of the interviewed beneficiaries are very satisfied with obvious and significant improvements in their lives. SHSE concept will crucially help them to restore the basic human dignity and will enable them to integrate into local community. The mixture of age, compositions of households, different levels of vulnerability and previous mutual acquaintanceship seem to ensure a certain level of solidarity“ (Mojovic, Dj, (2010), Evaluation of the IPA 2007 project implemented bz UNHCR in cooperation with Housing Center, UNHCR, Belgrade, p22). SHSE was idetified as the good practice by the jury of World Habitat Awards (WHA www.bshf.org), international competition established in 1985 for projects that provide practical and innovative solutions to current housing needs and problems. SHSE was one of the WHA finalists for 2008 and 2014. Website on World Housing Award finalists: http://www.worldhabitatawards.org/winners-and-finalists/project-details.cfm?lang=00&theProjectID=18AF3E27- 15C5-F4C0-998EF88CBA5BA35A

CONTACT (PRACTICES AUTHOR AND ORGANIZATION):

Housing Center – Housing Development Center for Socially Vulnerable Groups,

Nusiceva Str. 10, Belgrade, Serbia

Tel/fax: +381 11 3347331

office@housingcenter.org.rs

 

Branislava Žarković, director

bzarkovic@housingcenter.org.rs

bottom of page